nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: NV/NT TEC Adapter patches/fixes?

To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: Re: NV/NT TEC Adapter patches/fixes?
From: James Shanks <James_Shanks@TIVOLI.COM>
Date: Fri, 19 Mar 1999 10:17:20 -0500
Reply-to: Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU>
Sender: Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU>
There is a recent APAR in this area (PJ26332), one that was diagnosed just
this week, which says that basically, if the first variable of the trap is
not an integer with a value of less than 1000, then the trap will not get
passed to connected applications, of which the tecad adapter is one.  This
affects on NT NetView 5.1  Seems that there is an overly strict criteria
here that was added to trapd to cut down on the amount of traps it was
needlessly passing to other daemons.  The problem is that it was designed
by someone who thought about only NetView traps, and that's why it filters
out too much.

You could test whether this was your problem by using a custom trap you
code yourself with snmptrap.  Or you could just call Support, explain your
problem, and tell them you would like to get an efix when one is available.


James Shanks
Tivoli (NetView for UNIX) L3 Support



KG KG <kkg001@HOTMAIL.COM> on 03/17/99 11:00:32 AM

Please respond to Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on
      NetView <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU>

To:   NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU
cc:    (bcc: James Shanks)
Subject:  Re: NV/NT TEC Adapter patches/fixes?





Doug,


I am using tecad_nv6k between NV 5.1 on NT to send traps to a NT based
tec/3.6  on another server

I added enterprises to the tecad_nv6k.oid file, but the traps still dont
get thri.

also the tec adaptor proces gets all teh CPU.  Does anyone know of a
patch or a fix for this?

i am using the tme version of tecad_nv6k.  is the non_tme version any
better?

Thanks .
KKiran

>From: Doug Horn <Doug_Horn@HSBC.CA>
>Reply-To: Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on
NetView<NV-L@UCSBVM.ucsb.edu>
>To: NV-L@UCSBVM.ucsb.edu
>Subject: Re: NV/NT TEC Adapter patches/fixes?
>Date: Tue, 16 Mar 1999 16:07:39 -0800
>
>Subject:  NV/NT TEC Adapter patches/fixes?
>
>
>
>
>I am trying to use tecad_nv6k to send netview messages to a tec
console.
>
>The tec adapter is dying after some time.  It doesnt seem to be stable.
>Theres also an issue with the CPU it sometimes consumes
>
>Is there a patch for this?  anyone having a problem using this in a
>stable
>environment?
>
>>What version and flavour are you using ?
>
>I am also trying to send custom traps (Sent by Bay and Cisco's) and
>found out these are not sent to tec by default.  I added some trap
>definitions in tecad_nv6k.cds and .baroc files, compiled the baroc
>file under tec.. still not getting the traps..
>
>does anyone have a procedure for adding custom traps?
>
>
>>If the traps are comming into Netview then you must ensure >that the
OID
>#'s are in the teacd_nv6k.oid file.  I think >of the OID file like the
FMT
>file of a logfile adapter.  IF >it does not find a match it will not
>forward.  There are >some there but I have had to add to this file for
>>NetFinity, APC, 3COM, etc.
>
>NetView documentation is very inadequate when it comes to
>integration issues..
>
>Thanks,
>Kiran,
>
>Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web