| To: | nv-l@lists.tivoli.com | 
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: SNMPv1/SNMPv2 | 
| From: | michael.hamm@tudor.lu | 
| Date: | Thu, 16 Nov 2000 15:27:02 +0100 | 
| 
thanks very much,
so was it a good idea to send traps and informs from cisco-routers
in "version 1" or is it better to send them as "version 2c" ????
but i think it does not care???
Michael
                                                                                
                 
                    James_Shanks@                                               
                 
                    tivoli.com           To:     IBM NetView Discussion 
<nv-l@tkg.com>           
                    Sent by:             cc:                                    
                 
                    owner-nv-l@tk        Subject:     Re: [NV-L] SNMPv1/SNMPv2  
                 
                    g.com                                                       
                 
                                                                                
                 
                                                                                
                 
                    11/16/00                                                    
                 
                    02:25 PM                                                    
                 
                    Please                                                      
                 
                    respond to                                                  
                 
                    IBM NetView                                                 
                 
                    Discussion                                                  
                 
                                                                                
                 
                                                                                
                 
You cannot.  It uses SNMP V1 as the version number because it does not
support the complex security mechanism implemented by SNMPV2c (and largely
ignored by most vendors).  It sends a V1 style request even for V2 MIB
constructs,  which should work fine for all agents and all constructs.  I
am not aware of any cases where this does not work.  Remember that V2 is
largely a superset of V1, and that if we automatically changed the V1/V2
browser to send only V2 requests, then some V1 agents could not respond.
James Shanks
Team Leader, Level 3 Support
 Tivoli NetView for UNIX and NT
michael.hamm@tudor.lu on 11/16/2000 04:02:05 AM
Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>
To:   nv-l@tkg.com
cc:    (bcc: James Shanks/Tivoli Systems)
Subject:  [NV-L] SNMPv1/SNMPv2
The NetView MIB-Browser always write the message:
"Sending SNMPv1 request to ......."
How can I enable it to send SNMPv2 requests?????
any idea
_________________________________________________________________________
NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
_________________________________________________________________________
NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
 | 
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> | 
|---|---|---|
| 
 | ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: Cisco Mibs and traps to NetView and other NMS, James_Shanks | 
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | map cares on ip but ignores snmp, michael . hamm | 
| Previous by Thread: | Re: SNMPv1/SNMPv2, James_Shanks | 
| Next by Thread: | Re: SNMPv1/SNMPv2, James_Shanks | 
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] | 
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web