Hello again,
first of all I wanted to know if someone else have the same problem with
nodes added under Specific Nodes in the SNMP configuration and
second : It was I who opened and in the end got the lab to accept this as
the failure of NetView and then this APAR was opened so why should I have to
report the same problem twice ? It's just time consuming and the reason
I want it solved it that I don't want to manually delete all the entries in the
Specific
Nodes ...
So once again : have ANYONE else observed this defect or ...???
Mike Grüner
>If you think that an APAR is not fixed, then what can anybody tell you
>except to call Support and report it?
>I believe there are several conditions when a node will be added to your
>configuration, but since it is not my area of the product to work on, all I
>can advise is that you get someone official to lokk at it, so that if it is
>still broken, then it can be fixed.
>
>James Shanks
>Team Leader, Level 3 Support
>Tivoli NetView for UNIX and NT
>"Gruner Mike" <mike.gruner@rfv.sfa.se>@tkg.com on 05/09/2001 02:26:00 AM
>
>Please respond to IBM NetView Discussion <nv-l@tkg.com>
>
>Sent by: owner-nv-l@tkg.com
>
>
>To: nv-l@tkg.com
>cc:
>Subject: [NV-L] SNMP configuration and Specific Nodes added
>Hello,
>I'm on Aix 4.3.3 and NetView V 6.0.2 , I've had problems with nodes added
>on
>the specific nodes in the SNMP configuration screen , but
>this should have been solved with Apar IY13966 which is fixed in the
>NetView 6.0.2 version in the release notes. The problem is that I keep
>getting these specific nodes which have the same community name as the
>global
>setting in the SNMP configuration-screen. Our environment is
>that we have just included by means of seedfile only our routers in NetView
>and
>we are pollling 2very 2 minutes with Timeout set to 5 and retries set to 4.
>I'm getting a little bit tired of manually deleting the entries in the Specific
>Nodes ...
>
|