nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: -- More -- RE: Facilitating discovery of IP Objects

To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: RE: -- More -- RE: Facilitating discovery of IP Objects
From: "Allison, Jason (JALLISON)" <JALLISON@arinc.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2001 15:52:47 -0400
Stephen,

I actually havnt looked at the diagnoses giude, but it looks like it
explains a good bit.  I hope to have this problem resolved soon, Ill drop a
conclusion to the list when done.

Thanks again for your help,
Jason

-----Original Message-----
From: Stephen Hochstetler [mailto:shochste@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 10, 2001 3:13 PM
To: IBM NetView Discussion
Subject: RE: -- More -- RE: [NV-L] Facilitating discovery of IP Objects


Jason,

Thank you for clearing those two things up for me!    You are setting the
IF in that subnet to a "very long poll" period.   ok     Does that subnet
wildcard match your subnet mask?   "172.16.1-254.*" would appear that your
IF use 255.255.255.0 as their subnet mask.   If so, then NetView should be
creating network objects of 172.16.xxx on the IP map.       To
autodiscovery  interfaces in 172.16.1.* it would mean that you have to
manage network 172.16.1 on the ipmap.

If you have a complicated map with locations...etc., you may want to build
a collection of "networks" so they all appear in one view.   You could then
see if any are still unmanaged that should be managed instead.

With that said......have you worked through Chapter 2 of the NetView for
Unix Diagnosis Guide?

Thanks,
Stephen Hochstetler            shochste@us.ibm.com
ITSO Tivoli Coordinator - Austin
Office - 512-436-8564       FAX - 512-436-1991

ITSO redbooks at  http://www.redbooks.ibm.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web