|
Hello Dietmar,
Demandpoll,quicktest, /usr/OV/bin/ovtopodump -r and usr/OV/bin/xnmsnmpconf -resolv are working. The ouput comes as follows:-
# /usr/OV/bin/nmdemandpoll BBRT
14:53:06 ***** Starting demand poll of node BBRT *****
14:53:06 Interface 191.10.100.186 (currently up)
14:53:06 Interface 191.10.100.50 (currently up)
14:53:06 Interface 10.98.1.253 (currently up)
14:53:06 Interface 191.10.100.186(Serial0/0) is UP Responded to ping
14:53:06 Interface 10.98.1.253(FastEthernet0/0) is UP Responded to ping
14:53:18 Interface 191.10.100.50(BRI1/0) is DOWN Timed Out
14:53:18 Current polling parameters
14:53:18 scheduled configuration check at 09/27/03 10:11:55
14:53:18 scheduled new node poll at 09/26/03 14:56:35
14:53:18 auto-adjusted polling interval is 900 seconds
14:53:18 Get system identifier
14:53:18 Get system description
14:53:18 Get system name
14:53:18 Get IP forwarding status
14:53:18 Get IP address table
14:53:18 Get number of interfaces
14:53:19 Get interfaces table
14:53:20 interface Serial0/1 does not have an IP address
14:53:21 interface BRI1/0:1 does not have an IP address
14:53:22 interface BRI1/0:2 does not have an IP address
14:53:24 interface BRI1/0-Physical does not have an IP address
14:53:25 interface BRI1/0-Signaling does not have an IP address
14:53:26 interface BRI1/0:1-Bearer does not have an IP address
14:53:27 interface BRI1/0:2-Bearer does not have an IP address
14:53:28 Get CDP Cache entry
14:53:29 Get default routing entry
14:53:31 Get system location
14:53:32 Get system contact
14:53:33 Get Middle Level Manager
14:53:33 SNMP error: no such name
14:53:33 Get System Information Agent
14:53:33 SNMP error: no such name
14:53:33 Get Manager Product Name
14:53:33 SNMP error: no such name
14:53:33 Get SIA OS/2
14:53:33 SNMP error: no such name
14:53:33 Verify node name
14:53:33 node name verified to be BBRT
14:53:33 ***** End of demand poll for node BBRT
# /usr/OV/bin/quicktest BBRT
14:54:12 ***** Starting Quick Test of node BBRT *****
14:54:12 Interface 10.98.1.253(FastEthernet0/0) is UP Responded to ping
14:54:13 Interface 191.10.100.186(Serial0/0) is UP Responded to ping
14:54:24 Interface 191.10.100.50(BRI1/0) is DOWN Timed Out
14:54:24 ***** End of Quick Test for node BBRT *****
# /usr/OV/bin/ovtopodump -r 10.98.1.253
CLASS OBJECT ID OBJECT STATUS IP ADDRESS
NODES 1256/1255 BBRT Up 10.98.1.253
# /usr/OV/bin/xnmsnmpconf -resolv 10.98.1.253
name = 10.98.1.253
community = eSMNetWANVIEWER
proxy = <none>
timeout = 50
retry = 2
pollInterval = 1800
remotePort = 161
setCommunity = <default>
discoveryPoll = 1
useAutoAdjust = 1
fixedInterval = 900
confInterval = 86400
nodeDownIntrval= 604800
routeEntries = 800
discoverManage = 1
ipAddr = 10.98.1.253
isProxied = FALSE
ipAddrAge = Fri Sep 26 14:14:01 2003
Regards,
Anupam
-----Original Message-----
From: Dietmar Gaulhofer [mailto:DIETMAR_GAULHOFER@at.ibm.com]
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 4:14 PM
To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: RE: [nv-l] Errors in trapd.log related to community name
Hi,
i would try following:
/usr/OV/bin/nmdemandpoll "selection-name" to see if a config poll is
working
/usr/OV/bin/quicktest "selection-name" to see if status poll is working
to get the Selection-Name used in netview, i recommend to use
/usr/OV/bin/ovtopodump -r "ip address from the router" - the output will be
the "Selection-Name where the Ip-address is
attached to.
also useful:
/usr/OV/bin/xnmsnmpconf -resolv "ip-address" -> shows what netview will use
for polling.
Check if you use the "alternative Community file" also for polling ?
(config in serversetup).
Personaly i don't use the "alternative Community file at all - because it
adds single entries to the snmp configuration. And
i prefere the Wildcarding in the snmp configuration.
Dietmar
anand anupam <ananda@bharatpetroleum.com> on 25.09.2003 06:24:09
To: robin.james@eurocontrol.int, nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
cc:
Subject: RE: [nv-l] Errors in trapd.log related to community name
Hello Robin,
I have run "xnmsnmpconf -clearCache" as root. But the problem is still
there.
I also deleated all entry from "option->snmp configuration" menu for all
routers. Then restarted NetView map. Some routers have appeared in the
"snmp configuration" menu. But the problem is still there.
In trapd.log, following syntax is appearing as errorr :-
On the production :-
1064384482 11 Wed Sep 24 12:51:22 2003 BBRT A Cisco
Incorrect Community Name (authenticationFailure Trap) authAddr: BPCLNV
1064384487 11 Wed Sep 24 12:51:27 2003 BBRT A Cisco
Incorrect Community Name (authenticationFailure Trap) authAddr: BPCLNV
1064384490 11 Wed Sep 24 12:51:30 2003 BBRT A Cisco
Incorrect Community Name (authenticationFailure Trap) authAddr: BPCLNV
On Lab server:-
1064385128 11 Wed Sep 24 13:02:08 2003 BBRT A
Catalyst116CIncorrect Community Name (authenticationFailure Trap)
1064385133 11 Wed Sep 24 13:02:13 2003 BBRT A
Catalyst116CIncorrect Community Name (authenticationFailure Trap)
1064385136 11 Wed Sep 24 13:02:16 2003 BBRT A
Catalyst116CIncorrect Community Name (authenticationFailure Trap)
Inititial ouput of snmpwalk for this node
^C# ./snmpwalk BBRT
system.sysDescr.0 : DISPLAY STRING- (ascii): Cisco Internetwork Operating
Syste
m Software
IOS (tm) C1700 Software (C1700-Y-M), Version 12.2(2)XQ1, EARLY DEPLOYMENT
RELEAS
E SOFTWARE (fc1)
TAC Support: http://www.cisco.com/tac
Copyright (c) 1986-2001 by cisco Systems, Inc.
Compiled Tue 28-Aug-01
system.sysObjectID.0 : OBJECT IDENTIFIER:
.iso.org.dod.internet.private.en
terprises.cisco.ciscoProducts.326
system.sysUpTime.0 : Timeticks: (1010242) 2:48:22.42
system.sysContact.0 : DISPLAY STRING- (ascii):
system.sysName.0 : DISPLAY STRING- (ascii): bbrt
system.sysLocation.0 : DISPLAY STRING- (ascii): "Budge budge Installation"
system.sysServices.0 : INTEGER: 78
system.8.0 : Timeticks: (0) 0:00:00.00
interfaces.ifNumber.0 : INTEGER: 11
interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifIndex.1 : INTEGER: 1
interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifIndex.2 : INTEGER: 2
interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifIndex.3 : INTEGER: 3
interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifIndex.4 : INTEGER: 4
interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifIndex.5 : INTEGER: 5
Are these error related to some other aothentication failure. As it is clear from the following log, authAddr is 10.88.13.45. This IP we have not defined as trap destination in our routers.
1064459632 11 Thu Sep 25 09:43:52 2003 NDARORT2 A Cisco Incorrect Community Name (authenticationFailure Trap) authAddr: 10.88.13.45
1064459632 11 Thu Sep 25 09:43:52 2003 NDARORT A Cisco Incorrect Community Name (authenticationFailure Trap) authAddr: 10.88.13.45
Regrads,
Anupam
-----Original Message-----
From: JAMES Robin [mailto:robin.james@eurocontrol.int]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 2:25 PM
To: 'Nv-L (nv-l@lists.tivoli.com)'
Subject: RE: [nv-l] Errors in trapd.log related to community name
xnmsnmpconf is the application run when you select Options->SNMP
Configuration. You say the window shows a community name compatible
with your routers. There is one thing I suggest you try. Run the
command "xnmsnmpconf -clearcache" as root. Netview maintains a cache
for IP addresses and SNMP parameters and the cache probably has all
your old settings. See "man xnmsnmpconf" for a fuller description
about what this option does. You could also do a "-dumpcache
-verbose" to confirm this before you clear the cache.
Good luck
Robin
-----Original Message-----
From: anand anupam [mailto:ananda@bharatpetroleum.com]
Sent: Tuesday 23 September 2003 10:22
To: JAMES Robin
Subject: RE: [nv-l] Errors in trapd.log related to community name
Hello,
Under "option->snmp configuration" menu, almost all the routers are
showing correct "community name" as defined. All these community name
is also defined in "communityNames.conf" file. Also, I am able to do
demand poll for all these routers through GUI.
After disabling "public" community name, I have not run xnmsnmpconf.
What is the correct syntax to run xnmsnmpconf for all the routers.
Regards,
Anupam
-----Original Message-----
From: JAMES Robin [mailto:robin.james@eurocontrol.int]
Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 12:26 PM
To: 'Nv-L (nv-l@lists.tivoli.com)'
Subject: RE: [nv-l] Errors in trapd.log related to community
name
You must also configure the netview polling to use one of these
new community names. Have you run xnmsnmpconf to use one of the
new ones, if not, it is probably still using public?
Regards
Robin
-----Original Message-----
From: anand anupam [mailto:ananda@bharatpetroleum.com]
Sent: Tuesday 23 September 2003 06:48
To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: [nv-l] Errors in trapd.log related to community name
Hello Everybody,
We are having NetView 6.0.2 on AIX 4.3.3
We have defined six different community names in
"communityNames.conf" file under /usr/OV/conf directory for our
routers. Each routers have been configured to send SNMP trapd
to two AIX boxes(production+lab).
Recently, we started getting the following errors in our
trapd.log :-
++++++
1064214682 11 Mon Sep 22 13:41:22 2003 BHILAIRT
A Cisco Incorre
ct Community Name (authenticationFailure Trap) authAddr: BPCLNV
1064214728 11 Mon Sep 22 13:42:08 2003 SABARMATIRT
A Cisco Incorre
ct Community Name (authenticationFailure Trap) authAddr: BPCLNV
1064214733 11 Mon Sep 22 13:42:13 2003 MIRAJRT
A Cisco Incorre
ct Community Name (authenticationFailure Trap) authAddr: BPCLNV
1064214755 11 Mon Sep 22 13:42:35 2003 NDARORT
A Cisco Incorre
ct Community Name (authenticationFailure Trap) authAddr:
10.88.13.8
1064214755 11 Mon Sep 22 13:42:35 2003 NDARORT2
A Cisco Incorre
ct Community Name (authenticationFailure Trap) authAddr:
10.88.13.8
1064214775 11 Mon Sep 22 13:42:55 2003 swc_core1
A Cisco Incorre
ct Community Name (authenticationFailure Trap)
1064214780 11 Mon Sep 22 13:43:00 2003 swc_core1
A Cisco Incorre
ct Community Name (authenticationFailure Trap)
1064214828 11 Mon Sep 22 13:43:48 2003 MIRAJRT
A Cisco Incorre
ct Community Name (authenticationFailure Trap) authAddr: BPCLNV
1064214828 11 Mon Sep 22 13:43:48 2003 SABARMATIRT
A Cisco Incorre
ct Community Name (authenticationFailure Trap) authAddr: BPCLNV
1064215008 11 Mon Sep 22 13:46:48 2003 MIRAJRT
A Cisco Incorre
ct Community Name (authenticationFailure Trap) authAddr: BPCLNV
1064215008 11 Mon Sep 22 13:46:48 2003 SABARMATIRT
A Cisco Incorre
++++++
These errors were not coming earlier. But now are coming for
almost all the routers. Probably, network administrators have
removed public community name from all these routers. I
suppose, public community name is not mandatory?
Then what could be the reason for these errors and where this
could impact?
Regards,
Anupam
******************************************Disclaimer*************************************
The information contained in this message is BPCL's
Confidential and Proprietary information and is intended only
for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of
this message is not the intended recipient, he/she is hereby
notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying
of this communication or any of its content is strictly
prohibited. In such case, please advise the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. Further acknowledges that any
views expressed in this message are those of the individual
sender and no binding nature of the message shall be implied or
assumed unless the sender does so expressly with due authority
of BPCL.
********************************************************************************************
____ This message and any files transmitted with it are legally
privileged and intended for the sole use of the individual(s)
or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the
intended recipient, please notify the sender by reply and
delete the message and any attachments from your system. Any
unauthorised use or disclosure of the content of this message
is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Nothing in this
e-mail message amounts to a contractual or legal commitment on
the part of EUROCONTROL unless it is confirmed by appropriately
signed hard copy. Any views expressed in this message are those
of the sender.
******************************************Disclaimer*************************************
The information contained in this message is BPCL's Confidential and
Proprietary information and is intended only for the use of the
recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the
intended recipient, he/she is hereby notified that any use,
dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication or any
of its content is strictly prohibited. In such case, please advise
the sender immediately and delete it from your system. Further
acknowledges that any views expressed in this message are those of
the individual sender and no binding nature of the message shall be
implied or assumed unless the sender does so expressly with due
authority of BPCL.
********************************************************************************************
____ This message and any files transmitted with it are legally
privileged and intended for the sole use of the individual(s) or
entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended
recipient, please notify the sender by reply and delete the message
and any attachments from your system. Any unauthorised use or
disclosure of the content of this message is strictly prohibited and
may be unlawful. Nothing in this e-mail message amounts to a
contractual or legal commitment on the part of EUROCONTROL unless it
is confirmed by appropriately signed hard copy. Any views expressed
in this message are those of the sender.
******************************************Disclaimer*************************************
The information contained in this message is BPCL's Confidential and
Proprietary information and is intended only for the use of the
recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended
recipient, he/she is hereby notified that any use, dissemination,
distribution, or copying of this communication or any of its content is
strictly prohibited. In such case, please advise the sender immediately and
delete it from your system. Further acknowledges that any views expressed
in this message are those of the individual sender and no binding nature of
the message shall be implied or assumed unless the sender does so expressly
with due authority of BPCL.
********************************************************************************************
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: nv-l-unsubscribe@lists.tivoli.com
For additional commands, e-mail: nv-l-help@lists.tivoli.com
*NOTE*
This is not an Offical Tivoli Support forum. If you need immediate
assistance from Tivoli please call the IBM Tivoli Software Group
help line at 1-800-TIVOLI8(848-6548)
******************************************Disclaimer*************************************
The information contained in this message is BPCL's Confidential and Proprietary information and is intended only for the use of the recipient(s) named above. If the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, he/she is hereby notified that any use, dissemination, distribution, or copying of this communication or any of its content is strictly prohibited. In such case, please advise the sender immediately and delete it from your system. Further acknowledges that any views expressed in this message are those of the individual sender and no binding nature of the message shall be implied or assumed unless the sender does so expressly with due authority of BPCL.
********************************************************************************************
|