Hi Christopher,
my experience is that it doesn't matter which location symbol is used as
parrent and which is used as child.
I guess that your location.log contains still some more errors e.g. that OH
couldn't be created because it already exists.
Furthermore I guess that you get the problem when you openes a new
additional map.
All this sounds for me like APAR IY48698 which is fixed with NV713 FP02 and
in all furtehr releases like NV714 FP01 (which isn't available yet).
But you can get an interim fix for IY48698 from your support team.
Maybe this helps you.
Regards,
Hendrik
"Christopher J
Petrina" To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
<cjp8@meadwestvac cc:
o.com> Subject: [nv-l] lcoation.conf
7.1.4
Sent by:
owner-nv-l@lists.
us.ibm.com
20.01.04 00:14
Please respond to
nv-l
here is a small example of my location.conf
MidWest 0 Site
OH 0 Site MidWest
KY 0 Site MidWest
IN 0 Site MidWest
WV 0 Site MidWest
Dayton 10.x.x.x Site OH
Dayton 10.x.x.x. Site OH
Dayton 10.x.x.x Site OH
OK that seems simple enough right? Should create a container in OH called
Dayton. Since OH is already defined in MidWest.
I keep receiving the following error though.
location.conf[409]: Dayton 10.x.x.x Site OH
Unknown parent location: 'OH', parent entry must occur before child
any ideas.
Chris Petrina
|