To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [nv-l] availability data |
From: | "Christopher J Petrina" <cjp8@meadwestvaco.com> |
Date: | Tue, 27 Jan 2004 16:43:36 -0500 |
Delivery-date: | Tue, 27 Jan 2004 22:22:52 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
I was figuring that installing netview as stand alone was fine. The only true benefit I see in installing framework then netview, is that if I use a RIM for RDBMS then all my data that is in the flat files will be put into a (inour case) Oracle database. That way if I want to gather some odd information, such as all devices that are unmanaged, I can use a iSQL script to pull the data from the tables. I know it can be done using nvdbformat as well, but to write a isql script is much simpler. Plus we have other applications that can access the data as well. To me right now that is the only benefit I see to loading it via framework. Netview for Windows had topo2sql whichw ould do a dump of the flat files into a .mdb format the UNIX side has no such creature. -Chris Petrina |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [nv-l] TEC_ITS.rs traps stopped going to TEC. NV 7.1.4 TEC 3.9 [resolved???], Van Order, Drew \(US - Hermitage\) |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [nv-l] hostmibd and dpid2, Hendrik Zahn |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] availability data, George deSocio |
Next by Thread: | [nv-l] hostmibd and dpid2, Owens, Blaine C - Eastman |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web