To: | <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [nv-l] Ruleset Correlation |
From: | "Barr, Scott" <Scott_Barr@csgsystems.com> |
Date: | Fri, 28 May 2004 09:08:52 -0500 |
Delivery-date: | Fri, 28 May 2004 15:29:19 +0100 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Thread-index: | AcREuBJaU2wnE8zARoSkk1/NNaO/SQABFfnA |
Thread-topic: | Ruleset Correlation |
Greetings - NetView 7.1.3 & Solaris
2.8
I am working through some automation performance issues and
I observed something disturbing. I have automation that receives SNA mainframe
events, parses and formats the trap and writes it to a log. It also uses
snmptrap to generate a psuedo "node down" trap. When a corresponding up event is
received for the same SNA device I use snmptrap to send an "up" event. A
second ruleset performs correlation on the up and down events so that if the
duration between the up and down events is less than 10 minutes, it gets tossed,
otherwise a notification script is called that wakes up the help
desk.
What disturbs me is the behavior I see when we have a
significant outage - in my sample case, 34 SNA devices dropped at one time. When
the corresponding up messages occured, everything worked properly except the
notifications. The duration of the outage exceeded the time in pass on
match/resset on match timers but only 12 up notifications occured. According to
my application log and trapd.log, the 34 "up" events got generated but the
notifications did not. What I am wondering is whether there is a limit to the
number of outstanding correlated events, i.e. how many devices can be waiting
for a node up? Is it possible only 12 pairs of node down/ups can be outstanding?
Is there a way to look at whave events automation (and I'm not sure if it's
nvcorrd, actionsvr or ovactiond thats involved) still has
outstanding?
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [nv-l] install NV7.1.4 fails, George deSocio |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [nv-l] Ruleset Correlation, James Shanks |
Previous by Thread: | [nv-l] install NV7.1.4 fails, Cloostermans Helen (DBB) |
Next by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] Ruleset Correlation, James Shanks |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web