nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [nv-l] Stress Testing NV, looking for opinions

To: <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com>
Subject: RE: [nv-l] Stress Testing NV, looking for opinions
From: "Barr, Scott" <Scott_Barr@csgsystems.com>
Date: Thu, 3 Jun 2004 11:03:22 -0500
Delivery-date: Thu, 03 Jun 2004 17:17:33 +0100
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
Reply-to: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Thread-index: AcRJgkIKp/dmArsmSJaASO+DjVPEZwAAdcYQ
Thread-topic: [nv-l] Stress Testing NV, looking for opinions
One other thing - the use of smartsets and rulesets heavily affects performance. It would be beneficial if your testing included a variety of traps, not the same one over and over. In addition, pushing them through rulesets if possible would be a real good stress test especially if you have rulesets doing a "query smartset" node.
 
Would you be willing to share your script that generates the traps? I am interested in doing the same thing.


From: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com] On Behalf Of Brett Coley
Sent: Thursday, June 03, 2004 10:44 AM
To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [nv-l] Stress Testing NV, looking for opinions

That sounds like a valid way to test, but I'm thinking
you may want to throw in some more randomness, maybe
some heavier peaks.   Sounds like the 250 in 50 secs are
dealt with ok in their 10 minute window, but what happens
with a burst of 1000 thrown into the mix?
 
Regards,
Brett
Tivoli Software/IBM
 
 
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web