To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [nv-l] MLM functionality in 7.1.4 |
From: | "Christopher J Petrina" <cjp8@meadwestvaco.com> |
Date: | Wed, 18 Aug 2004 10:22:51 -0400 |
Delivery-date: | Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:47:54 +0100 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <412361C7.6000106@bellsouth.net> |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
If the Unix MLM communicates differently withtl he cetnral host then that would be true. However if the Unix MLM communicates usng MIB oid's and uses the MLM MIBs to communicate back to the central host, then it will pose the same problem. By design a MIB oid cannot have a zero embedded in the oid, since a (0) acts as a terminating identifier in a OID. If the unix side still uses the IP address to create a unique identifier back; to the central netview box, it will be the same as the NT side. What I am looking for is a distribuited architecture in which I can have remote management stations out at my major mills who have some ability at autonomy, allowing them customization of maps and threshold settings, while still being able to send back critical events and traps tot he central netview server back in our data center. If I am misunderstanding the ability of MLM's then I apologize, but the architecture I seek is still the same. The requirement of having them use the web console to access the central hosts maps is not customizable enough, And at the current traffic of our network having a single netview server cannot handle all of our events and traps. Thank you Chris Petrina
Chris, MLM's do not have maps. They monitor what is on the local subnet unless otherwise configured to do more. Also remember that MLM can only poll via ping and not snmp. You can threshold the traps from the MLM and these can be controlled by MLM and you can use APM to distribute the profiles to the MLMs. As for the 0 problem that is related to any device that the MLM will be discovering, however this is only related to MLM on NT. I don't believe the same problem affects the UNIX side. Paul Christopher J Petrina wrote: > > Greetngs all. > > I have returned with more dubious questions about Netview and MLMs. I > am seeking a means of distributed network management using Netview. I > wish to offload some of the processing onto the MLMs that are > distributed out to our major sites. At the same time I want those > remote sites to have the ability manage their own maps and threshold > settings. Can each remote MLM site have its own set of maps? > different from those at the central netview box? Also I see need some > clarification about the embedded zero (0) issue (IY29719). Does this > issue only pertain tot he IP address of the MLM box itself, or does it > pertain to any ip address that the MLM will discover? > > Netview 7.1.4 on AIX 5.2 - central server > > would like to have the MLM running on NT boxes in the remote sites. > But can look at running them on unix. > I have re read through all the postings here in regards to some of the > same issues I have asked adn the responses, only looking for am ore > precise answer about the IY29719 issue and if anyone has a suggestion > about to to best implement distributed netview environment. > > Thank you > Chris Petrina > > ________________________________________________________________________ > This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan > service._______________________________________________________________ > > This electronic message contains information from MeadWestvaco > Corporation or subsidiary companies, which may be confidential, > privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. The > information is intended to be used solely by the recipient(s) > named. If you are not an intended recipient, be aware that > any review, disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this > transmission or its contents is prohibited. If you have > received this transmission in error, please notify MeadWestvaco > immediately at postmaster@MeadWestvaco.com. > _______________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service._______________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________ This email has been scanned for all viruses by the MessageLabs SkyScan service._______________________________________________________________ This electronic message contains information from MeadWestvaco Corporation or subsidiary companies, which may be confidential, privileged or otherwise protected from disclosure. The information is intended to be used solely by the recipient(s) named. If you are not an intended recipient, be aware that any review, disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this transmission or its contents is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please notify MeadWestvaco immediately at postmaster@MeadWestvaco.com. _______________________________________________________________________ |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [nv-l] MLM functionality in 7.1.4, Stephen Hochstetler |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [nv-l] MLM functionality in 7.1.4, Paul |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] MLM functionality in 7.1.4, Christopher J Petrina |
Next by Thread: | [nv-l] discovery from linux?, Mike |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web