To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [nv-l] MLM functionality in 7.1.4 |
From: | Paul <pstroud@bellsouth.net> |
Date: | Wed, 18 Aug 2004 10:39:21 -0400 |
Delivery-date: | Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:55:52 +0100 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <OF49E8C9DE.33C3C4A5-ON86256EF4.004DDA33-86256EF4.004F2222@us.ibm.com> |
References: | <OF49E8C9DE.33C3C4A5-ON86256EF4.004DDA33-86256EF4.004F2222@us.ibm.com> |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
User-agent: | Mozilla Thunderbird 0.7a (X11/20040614) |
Stephen, Good call I think that would work leaving only the configuration of theMLM as a problem. If the server is UNIX, then the MLMs could be configured via the server itself. As for the traps local vs thresholded through the MLM I think this could be handled by setting both as trap destinations? Thoughts? Paul Stephen Hochstetler wrote: Paul and all,Can't we run an 'attended' MLM on Windows? This is where both NetView and MLM code is installed on the same box. This allows a local map that sees local network and a remote server that sees the corporate network. However, if you set a local threshold on that 'attended MLM' i think only that local server will be informed of the alert. Also, only the UNIX platform has the GUI for setting thresholds on the MLM.Stephen Hochstetler shochste@us.ibm.com International Technical Support Organization at IBM Office - 512-838-6198 (t/l 678) FAX - 512-838-6931 http://www.redbooks.ibm.com |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [nv-l] MLM functionality in 7.1.4, Christopher J Petrina |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [nv-l] MLM functionality in 7.1.4, Stephen Hochstetler |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] MLM functionality in 7.1.4, Stephen Hochstetler |
Next by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] MLM functionality in 7.1.4, Stephen Hochstetler |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web