To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [nv-l] discovery from linux? |
From: | Mike <mikee@mikee.ath.cx> |
Date: | Thu, 19 Aug 2004 08:05:26 -0500 |
Delivery-date: | Thu, 19 Aug 2004 14:16:02 +0100 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <41248BFC.9060303@bellsouth.net> |
Organization: | The Math Forum |
References: | <20040818164609.GE4588@mikee.ath.cx> <OF1FD53C17.2268D79F-ON87256EF4.005CDAF9-85256EF4.005D3067@us.ibm.com> <20040818185012.GI4588@mikee.ath.cx> <4123A6BE.6070309@bellsouth.net> <20040818190415.GJ4588@mikee.ath.cx> <4123AA88.5070709@bellsouth.net> <20040818191832.GL4588@mikee.ath.cx> <4123AC7E.4050000@bellsouth.net> <20040818193024.GM4588@mikee.ath.cx> <41248BFC.9060303@bellsouth.net> |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
User-agent: | Mutt/1.4.1i |
On Thu, 19 Aug 2004, Paul wrote: > Clear the database(nv6000_smit clear_topology_db) and then > restart the daemons and see if your discovery is any different > now. Starting netview this morning I was seeing lots of nodes. Then I moved a previous location.conf in place, cleared the topology database, restarted the daemons, and now it's not discovering again. nvstat shows all daemons running. Mike |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [nv-l] NV map question, James Shanks |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [nv-l] Ralf Geiger/LVA29_BS/DE ist außer Haus. [virengeprüft], Ralf . Geiger |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] discovery from linux?, Paul |
Next by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] discovery from linux?, Dietmar Gaulhofer |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web