nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [nv-l] % cpu utilization

To: <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com>
Subject: RE: [nv-l] % cpu utilization
From: "Glen Warn" <Glen.Warn@pemcocorp.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 09:35:44 -0700
Delivery-date: Tue, 20 Sep 2005 17:36:24 +0100
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
Reply-to: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Thread-index: AcW9BWbMCqk/rBR7QhinpA2ZfZN3pQANDoNQAB6r66AABJcq8AAOnH6A
Thread-topic: [nv-l] % cpu utilization
No, I don't believe it will.  That only supplies additional info that might be useful if you have a very large network.
Based on your information, I would recommend a debug packet or capture to see what's happening at the pix when you try to poll for CPU.  One last thought, is this pix running the same version of IOS that the other units are (that are working)?
 
Glen Warn
PEMCO Corporation Computer Services (PCCS)
206-628-5770
 


From: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com] On Behalf Of praveen kumar
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 2:38 AM
To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: RE: [nv-l] % cpu utilization

 

 

 

 Glen one more thing is snmp-server contact and snmp server location is not configured in the pix will it prevent the monitoring of the cpu?  

 


From: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com] On Behalf Of praveen kumar
Sent: Tuesday, September 20, 2005 12:57 PM
To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: RE: [nv-l] % cpu utilization

 

 

Hi Glen ,

Thanks for your response,

I am able to monitor the memory utilization successfully, so the community string or snmp protocol will not be a problem, I guess.

 

  True regards,

Praveen

 


From: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com] On Behalf Of Glen Warn
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 10:31 PM
To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: RE: [nv-l] % cpu utilization

 

Am sure the answer here is yes, but I have to ask - can you do a simple demand poll or snmp query?  I have had one problem where I had a $ in my comm string and it only worked with certain queries.  You might try a temp comm string for testing too?  Lastly, have you setup the appropriate snmp parameters on the PIX?  See sample below - be sure your nearest interface to the Netview is specified.  If you have access to the pix, I believe there is a debug SNMP command, if not you could do a debug packet on the interface in question with Netview as the src and your pix interface as the dst.

 

snmp-server host INTERFACE_NAME ip_addr
snmp-server location XXXXXX
snmp-server contact YYYYYY

snmp-server community ZZZZZZZ
snmp-server enable traps

 

Hope this helps,

 

Glen Warn

PEMCO Corporation Computer Services (PCCS)

glen.warn@pemcocorp.com

206-628-5770

 

 


From: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com] On Behalf Of praveen kumar
Sent: Monday, September 19, 2005 3:32 AM
To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: [nv-l] % cpu utilization

 

Hi all,

I am running netview 7.1.4  windows-2003

I am successfully monitoring the cpu utilization of all my pix firewall version 6.3 in one of my pix the utilization is showing always zero .I do not know why ,would anyone help me in trouble shooting this problem

 

 True regards,

Praveen

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web