| To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [nv-l] Routing table pulled |
| From: | James Shanks <jshanks@us.ibm.com> |
| Date: | Fri, 14 Oct 2005 14:52:46 -0400 |
| Delivery-date: | Fri, 14 Oct 2005 19:53:34 +0100 |
| Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
| In-reply-to: | <1A1A54B7A0FB7D4C9CA35B85EB55B6F10BA69280@na1fcm57.dearborn.ford.com> |
| Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
| Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
This is configurable in xnmsnmpconf, under the field "Number of Route
Entries".
Default is 800 according to the Help, which you can verify yourself. If
you think a max of 800 is too high you can set something else.
Are you having a problem or just worried about one?
James Shanks
Level 3 Support for Tivoli NetView for UNIX and Windows
Tivoli Software / IBM Software Group
"Kain, Becki
\(B.\)"
<bkain1@ford.com> To
Sent by: <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com>
owner-nv-l@lists. cc
us.ibm.com
Subject
[nv-l] Routing table pulled
10/14/2005 01:41
PM
Please respond to
nv-l
Folks:
Apparently, under hpov, when a router was discovered, the entire routing
table of the router was pulled as well, causing the cpu to spike because it
pulled one route at a time. Does NV do the same thing when it discovers a
node?
Thanks
|
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [nv-l] Routing table pulled, Kain, Becki \(B.\) |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [nv-l] Routing table pulled, Kain, Becki \(B.\) |
| Previous by Thread: | [nv-l] Routing table pulled, Kain, Becki \(B.\) |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] Routing table pulled, Kain, Becki \(B.\) |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web