nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [nv-l] Routing table pulled

To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [nv-l] Routing table pulled
From: James Shanks <jshanks@us.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 14:52:46 -0400
Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 19:53:34 +0100
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
In-reply-to: <1A1A54B7A0FB7D4C9CA35B85EB55B6F10BA69280@na1fcm57.dearborn.ford.com>
Reply-to: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
This is configurable in xnmsnmpconf, under the field "Number of Route
Entries".

Default is 800 according to the Help, which you can verify yourself.  If
you think a max of 800 is too high you can set something else.

Are you having a problem or just worried about one?

James Shanks
Level 3 Support  for Tivoli NetView for UNIX and Windows
Tivoli Software / IBM Software Group


                                                                           
             "Kain, Becki                                                  
             \(B.\)"                                                       
             <bkain1@ford.com>                                          To 
             Sent by:                  <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com>             
             owner-nv-l@lists.                                          cc 
             us.ibm.com                                                    
                                                                   Subject 
                                       [nv-l] Routing table pulled         
             10/14/2005 01:41                                              
             PM                                                            
                                                                           
                                                                           
             Please respond to                                             
                   nv-l                                                    
                                                                           
                                                                           




Folks:


Apparently, under hpov, when a router was discovered, the entire routing
table of the router was pulled as well, causing the cpu to spike because it
pulled one route at a time.  Does NV do the same thing when it discovers a
node?


Thanks




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web