To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [nv-l] Routing table pulled |
From: | James Shanks <jshanks@us.ibm.com> |
Date: | Fri, 14 Oct 2005 14:52:46 -0400 |
Delivery-date: | Fri, 14 Oct 2005 19:53:34 +0100 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <1A1A54B7A0FB7D4C9CA35B85EB55B6F10BA69280@na1fcm57.dearborn.ford.com> |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
This is configurable in xnmsnmpconf, under the field "Number of Route Entries". Default is 800 according to the Help, which you can verify yourself. If you think a max of 800 is too high you can set something else. Are you having a problem or just worried about one? James Shanks Level 3 Support for Tivoli NetView for UNIX and Windows Tivoli Software / IBM Software Group "Kain, Becki \(B.\)" <bkain1@ford.com> To Sent by: <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com> owner-nv-l@lists. cc us.ibm.com Subject [nv-l] Routing table pulled 10/14/2005 01:41 PM Please respond to nv-l Folks: Apparently, under hpov, when a router was discovered, the entire routing table of the router was pulled as well, causing the cpu to spike because it pulled one route at a time. Does NV do the same thing when it discovers a node? Thanks |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [nv-l] Routing table pulled, Kain, Becki \(B.\) |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [nv-l] Routing table pulled, Kain, Becki \(B.\) |
Previous by Thread: | [nv-l] Routing table pulled, Kain, Becki \(B.\) |
Next by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] Routing table pulled, Kain, Becki \(B.\) |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web