[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [nv-l] Routing table pulled

To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [nv-l] Routing table pulled
From: Paul Stroud <nvladmin@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 15:09:02 -0400
Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 20:09:33 +0100
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
In-reply-to: <1A1A54B7A0FB7D4C9CA35B85EB55B6F1101E0462@na1fcm57.dearborn.ford.com>
References: <1A1A54B7A0FB7D4C9CA35B85EB55B6F1101E0462@na1fcm57.dearborn.ford.com>
Reply-to: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 1.0 (X11/20041206)
Do NOT set it to 0 as that will cause it to pull all the routes use
1 instead.


Kain, Becki (B.) wrote:

Do I need it configured at all?  Apparently, this person's concern was
under HPOV, that when it discovered a router, it made 6000 individual
snmp get statements for each routing statement.
What is the impact of setting this to 0?

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com]
On Behalf Of James Shanks
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 2:53 PM
To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [nv-l] Routing table pulled

This is configurable in xnmsnmpconf, under the field "Number of Route

Default is 800 according to the Help, which you can verify yourself.  If
you think a max of 800 is too high you can set something else.

Are you having a problem or just worried about one?

James Shanks
Level 3 Support  for Tivoli NetView for UNIX and Windows
Tivoli Software / IBM Software Group

            "Kain, Becki


To Sent by: <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com>

cc us.ibm.com

Subject [nv-l] Routing table pulled

            10/14/2005 01:41


            Please respond to



Apparently, under hpov, when a router was discovered, the entire routing
table of the router was pulled as well, causing the cpu to spike because
it pulled one route at a time.  Does NV do the same thing when it
discovers a node?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web