[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [nv-l] Routing table pulled

To: <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com>
Subject: RE: [nv-l] Routing table pulled
From: "Kain, Becki \(B.\)" <bkain1@ford.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 14:55:19 -0400
Delivery-date: Fri, 14 Oct 2005 19:55:49 +0100
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
Hop-count: 1
Reply-to: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Thread-index: AcXQ8Ii5SHMFL6t4RdqYkVlsWCtABgAAA10g
Thread-topic: [nv-l] Routing table pulled
Do I need it configured at all?  Apparently, this person's concern was
under HPOV, that when it discovered a router, it made 6000 individual
snmp get statements for each routing statement.  

What is the impact of setting this to 0?

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com]
On Behalf Of James Shanks
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 2:53 PM
To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [nv-l] Routing table pulled

This is configurable in xnmsnmpconf, under the field "Number of Route

Default is 800 according to the Help, which you can verify yourself.  If
you think a max of 800 is too high you can set something else.

Are you having a problem or just worried about one?

James Shanks
Level 3 Support  for Tivoli NetView for UNIX and Windows
Tivoli Software / IBM Software Group


             "Kain, Becki


             Sent by:                  <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com>


                                       [nv-l] Routing table pulled

             10/14/2005 01:41




             Please respond to





Apparently, under hpov, when a router was discovered, the entire routing
table of the router was pulled as well, causing the cpu to spike because
it pulled one route at a time.  Does NV do the same thing when it
discovers a node?


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web