Do I need it configured at all? Apparently, this person's concern was
under HPOV, that when it discovered a router, it made 6000 individual
snmp get statements for each routing statement.
What is the impact of setting this to 0?
From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]
On Behalf Of James Shanks
Sent: Friday, October 14, 2005 2:53 PM
Subject: Re: [nv-l] Routing table pulled
This is configurable in xnmsnmpconf, under the field "Number of Route
Default is 800 according to the Help, which you can verify yourself. If
you think a max of 800 is too high you can set something else.
Are you having a problem or just worried about one?
Level 3 Support for Tivoli NetView for UNIX and Windows
Tivoli Software / IBM Software Group
Sent by: <firstname.lastname@example.org>
[nv-l] Routing table pulled
Please respond to
Apparently, under hpov, when a router was discovered, the entire routing
table of the router was pulled as well, causing the cpu to spike because
it pulled one route at a time. Does NV do the same thing when it
discovers a node?