nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: NV & CW2000 sizing

To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: Re: NV & CW2000 sizing
From: "Whitehead, Neil" <whitern@RBOS.CO.UK>
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 1999 21:07:31 -0000
Reply-to: Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU>
Sender: Discussion of IBM NetView and POLYCENTER Manager on NetView <NV-L@UCSBVM.UCSB.EDU>
You're absolutely right !!! It is a 332MHz upgrade....

Neil Whitehead (x22808)
IT Services (Telecoms)
The Royal Bank of Scotland
Tel: 0131-523 2808
e-mail: whitern@rbos.co.uk

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gil Irizarry [SMTP:IRIZARRG@LABS.WYETH.COM]
> Sent: Monday, April 12, 1999 6:29 PM
> To:   NV-L@UCSBVM.ucsb.edu
> Subject:      Re: NV & CW2000 sizing
>
>
> *** Warning : this message originates from the Internet ****
>
> Neil:
>    Thank you for the update. I am still waiting for my copy of AIX_CW2K
> from Cisco. I hope that they are holding it until all the fixes identified
> by you and others are corrected.
> Please let me know how much memory the jre daemon eats up. I did see an
> email that said 200 meg with 80 % CPU on Solaris 2.6.
> As I understand, the upgrades available for the F50 are 166(1-4) or
> 332(1-4). I did not see any 266 upgrades in my book, anyway, may be it
> does exist.
> Thanks again;
> Gil Irizarry
>
>
> >>> "Whitehead, Neil" <whitern@RBOS.CO.UK> 04/12 7:51 AM >>>
> Gil,
>
> I recently installed Cw2k on an F50 nearly matching your specifications..
> (dual processor 166MHz, 512Mb RAM, AIX 4.2.1, NetView v4, CW4.).
>
> After some initial (annoying!) install problems (which Cisco are now aware
> of and have work-arounds for) everything seems to be OK. I have noticed
> that
> the Web Server component of CW2K is very processor intensive (25%
> Utilisation on those components alone). In our particular environment that
> was deemed to be unacceptably high so we're installing a replacement
> processor board (dual 266MHz) and an additional 256MB RAM
>
> The upgrade hasn't arrived yet so I can't say how it has improved.
>
> Neil Whitehead (x22808)
> IT Services (Telecoms)
> The Royal Bank of Scotland
> Tel: 0131-523 2808
> e-mail: whitern@rbos.co.uk
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Gil Irizarry [SMTP:IRIZARRG@LABS.WYETH.COM]
> > Sent: Thursday, April 08, 1999 2:36 PM
> > To:   NV-L@UCSBVM.ucsb.edu
> > Subject:      Re: NV & CW2000 sizing
> >
> >
> > *** Warning : this message originates from the Internet ****
> >
> > Neil:
> >   I am doing a test drive with CW2K running on NT4.0 256 meg of mem. The
> > (jre (Java RunTime Exec)) is eating the memory quite fast. They tell me
> > that the problem is with NT and that there is possible fix coming.
> > We have ordered CW2K for an F50 running AIX 4.3.2 NV5.1 & 512 Meg of
> > memory. I am planning to upgrade from CW4.0 very soon.
> > Do you have some specific recommendation / customization for UNIX jre
> > daemons?
> > Thanks in advance
> > Gil Irizarry
> >
> > >>> Neil Harvey <nharvey@ISL4.DEMON.CO.UK> 04/08 9:10 AM >>>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I am looking for a bit of advice or feedback regarding installing
> > CiscoWorks2000. At the moment the platform is an E20 (256MB memory)
> > running NV5.1 and CiscoWorks 4.0, it was orginally sized for NV4.1 with
> > CW4.0 (a few years ago). CW2000 is required to provide the CWSI for
> > their new switches and hence essentials resource manager (ERM) will have
> > to be installed (I believe it is a pre-req for CWSI?). They are quite
> > happy to migrate/remove CW4.0 and replace it with ERM.
> >
> > I have installed CW2000 on a solaris platform running HPOV NNM and found
> > some of the CWSI daemons to be a bit CPU hungry and had to alter the
> > configuation files (in particular the jre processes). I have already
> > seem some usefull posting on the forum regarding possible problems and
> > was looking for any feeling on the platform size or any further caveats
> > I should be aware of.
> >
> > At present it is a 70 router network (5000 objects in the database) but
> > growing to a 300 router network (mainly Cisco devices) in the next few
> > months.
> >
> > Thanks in advance, Neil.
>
>
> This e-mail message is confidential and for use by the addressee only.  If
> the message is received by anyone other than the addressee, please return
> the message to the sender by replying to it and then delete the message
> from your computer..
>
> 'Internet e-mails are not necessarily secure. The Royal Bank of Scotland
> plc does not accept responsibility for changes made to this message after
> it was sent.'


This e-mail message is confidential and for use by the addressee only.  If the 
message is received by anyone other than the addressee, please return the 
message to the sender by replying to it and then delete the message from your 
computer..

'Internet e-mails are not necessarily secure. The Royal Bank of Scotland plc 
does not accept responsibility for changes made to this message after it was 
sent.'

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web