nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: Acknowledging

To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: RE: Acknowledging
From: "Leslie Clark" <lclark@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 22:50:02 -0500
This is covered in the release notes for 6.0.2. It involves exporting
the environment variable 'NVMAPGLOBALACK=1' in the profile
of the users. Be aware that there is a bug in it at 6.0.2 under some
circumstances - I think it was reported here that the cure was found,
though, so if you upgrade to 6.0.2 or 6.0.3 you can ask Support
about it.  I believe it was a problem when there was more than one
Motif map open, and they would get going back and forth with
the Christmas-tree effect. Kind of scary and pretty at the same time.
But I've used it safely and often in web environments, where there
is only one Motif map.

Hey - why not go all the way to V7.1, and get the operators onto
that web client? (no sense in showing the the V6 client and then
changing again...) Lots of these issues go away then. Including my
favorite, dynamic membership in SmartSets, which you could never
make good use of in a read/only Motif map. V7.1 is really designed
for shops like yours with a number of operators.

Cordially,

Leslie A. Clark
IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking
Detroit



                                                                                
             
                    Kevin Smith                                                 
             
                    <c-kevin.smith1       To:     IBM NetView Discussion 
<nv-l@tkg.com>      
                    @wcom.com>            cc:                                   
             
                    Sent by:              Subject:     RE: [NV-L] Acknowledging 
             
                    owner-nv-l@tkg.                                             
             
                    com                                                         
             
                                                                                
             
                                                                                
             
                    01/07/02 03:31                                              
             
                    PM                                                          
             
                    Please respond                                              
             
                    to IBM NetView                                              
             
                    Discussion                                                  
             
                                                                                
             
                                                                                
             



How do you enable "Global Acknowledge Mode"??

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nv-l@tkg.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@tkg.com]On Behalf Of
Ingersoll, Robert
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 2:50 PM
To: 'IBM NetView Discussion'
Subject: RE: [NV-L] Acknowledging


As designed at 5.1.3.  Upgrade to 6.0.2 or better and use global
Acknowledge
mode.  It will do what you want.


--
Bob Ingersoll
USAA Information Technology Company (ITCO)


-----Original Message-----
From: Allison, Jason (JALLISON) [mailto:JALLISON@arinc.com]
Sent: Tuesday, November 27, 2001 1:34 PM
To: 'nv-l@tkg.com'
Subject: [NV-L] Acknowledging


AIX 4.3.3 - Netview 5.1.3

We are now instructing our operators to acknowledge container symbols when
there is a failure that is known.  This works fine when we have one
instance
of 'netview' running.  Acknowledging works as expected.  We have come
across
some problems when bringing up another instance of 'netview' (TME10 GUI).
The background is we have a second AIX box that will remotely shell into
the
first box already running an instance of 'netview'.  We will bring up this
second instance of TME10 as a read-only map, which has worked fine for some
time.  Our problem is that the second instance of the map does not seems to
synchronize the currently acknowledged containers, nor if I acknowledge a
container while both are up do they then sync.

My question(s) are:

- Is this 'as designed'?

- If so, why?  Pros/Cons.  Why is this desirable?

- Can both maps be synced up?

- What are my options?



Hopefully I am not missing any information,
Thanks for your time,


Jason Allison
_________________________________________________________________________
NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l
_________________________________________________________________________
NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l

_________________________________________________________________________
NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web