nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: RE: [nv-l] MIB Bata Collector Problem and Very big snmpcol.trace

To: <nv-l@lists.tivoli.com>
Subject: RE: RE: [nv-l] MIB Bata Collector Problem and Very big snmpcol.trace
From: "Karl Prinelle" <Karl.Prinelle@elyzium.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 2 Sep 2003 11:05:59 +0100
Delivered-to: mailing list nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Delivery-date: Tue, 02 Sep 2003 11:08:27 +0100
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
Importance: Normal
In-reply-to: <WWWOlbcrYP0QzBxhJTA000005a2@sysway.com>
List-help: <mailto:nv-l-help@lists.tivoli.com>
List-post: <mailto:nv-l@lists.tivoli.com>
List-subscribe: <mailto:nv-l-subscribe@lists.tivoli.com>
List-unsubscribe: <mailto:nv-l-unsubscribe@lists.tivoli.com>
Mailing-list: contact nv-l-help@lists.tivoli.com; run by ezmlm
Since I had that experience with Win/Netview I've tried to always use a
*nix platform for netview & had much better experiences.  On *nix you
also get the ruleset editor which is really useful.
If you have the time etc then I'd be tempted by a migration - personal
view of course.
K
-----Original Message-----
From: Haibo Yang [mailto:hbyang@sysway.com] 
Sent: 02 September 2003 04:01
To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
Subject: Re: RE: [nv-l] MIB Bata Collector Problem and Very big snmpcol.
trace


Thank you very much for your help.

In fact, I have noticed the problem with graphing. But I didn't realized
that it is because of the holes on the collection.

Well, What should I do then? Seems that most of netviewrs let netview
running on other platform, but Windows. 

Should I consider to migrate my netview to linux or unix too?

Cordially

Bruce Yang
0086-755-26742343
hbyang@sysway.com


        

======= 2003-09-01 18:45:00 您在来信中写道:=======

>Another issue I found terrible, Netview for Windows does not graph data

>before a hole on the collection. You just have graph from the last 
>continuous successful stream collection. I opened a call for support, 
>and the answer was "Work by design" ! ok...:/
>I moved for Netview/Linux.
>
>--
>Helder Garcia
>
>On Sun, 2003-08-31 at 06:07, Karl Prinelle wrote:
>> Bruce,
>> 
>> I've had the same problem in the past on w2k netview & had to change 
>> netview platforms.
>> 
>> In my situation the routers being monitored were quite busy.  If the 
>> device is busy and you send an snmp query to it, then it can simply 
>> ignore your query since it has higher priority work to complete 
>> (routing!).  Also, if you send a query for a large number of objects 
>> then this can cause the query to be ignored too.  The combination of 
>> a busy router and large (no metric for how large is large I'm afraid)

>> snmp query increases the chance of the query being ignored.  The 
>> result is the deferred collection.
>> 
>> You can reduce the snmpCollect deferred timeout value which is 1hr by

>> default.  This won't mean the deferrals will stop, just that 
>> snmpCollect will try that query again in a shorter timeframe.  When I

>> did this I still ended up with large numbers of consecutive deferrals

>> which created large holes in my data.
>> 
>> I was pointed at the maxpuds value which is available on Unix/Linux 
>> netview versions (not available on windows) - have a search on the 
>> archive for that for more info.  As a test I tried putting a Solaris 
>> Netview in place, set the maxpdus to 40 and it all worked fine.  I've

>> tried w2k netview polling ~600 interfaces on two large but quiet 
>> routers & it never completed a query - swapping to AIX/netview & 
>> maxpuds=50 & all was ok.
>> 
>> 
>> hth
>> 
>> K
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---
>> ---
>> Karl Prinelle
>> Elyzium Ltd
>> Office: +44 (0)1753 515000
>> Mobile: +44 (0)7813 189198
>>  
>> E-mail: karl.prinelle@elyzium.co.uk
>>  
>> Website:www.elyzium.co.uk
>>  
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> ---
>> ---
>> Elyzium Disclaimer:
>> This email transmission is confidential and intended solely for the
>> person 
>> or organisation to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended 
>> recipient, you must not copy, distribute or disseminate the
information,
>> or 
>> take any action in reliance of it. Any views expressed in this
message
>> are 
>> those of the individual sender, except where the sender specifically
>> states 
>> them to be the views of any organisation or employer. 
>> If you have received this message in error, do not open any
attachment 
>> but please notify the sender (above) deleting this message from your
>> system. 
>> Please rely on your own virus check no responsibility is taken by the
>>  sender for any damage arising out of any bug or virus infection.
>>
------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --- 
>> 
>> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Haibo Yang [mailto:hbyang@sysway.com]
>> Sent: 30 August 2003 10:20
>> To: nv-l@lists.tivoli.com
>> Subject: [nv-l] MIB Bata Collector Problem and Very big snmpcol.trace
>> 
>> 
>> Hello List:
>> 
>> Netview 7.1.3+Win2000 Server +MS SQL Server2000+ Popular Patches.
>> 
>> There are currently more than 50 routers in my customers enviroment 
>> and I have set the Mib datacolletor to collect data for all the 
>> CisocDevices for avgBusy5, BandwitdthUtilHdx, ifInErrors, 
>> ifOutErrors, BitsIn, BitsOut etc. which are all standard mib-2 OID or

>> default Cisco OID or MIB Expression provided by Netview. When I use 
>> sql to query the collected data in sql2000, I find that for a Cisco 
>> 7507, there are more than 300 entries for avgBusy5, but for some 
>> other cisco 3664, 3662 there are much less entries and even there is 
>> none!!!
>> 
>> And for only less than one week, the snmpcol.trace has grown into a 
>> monitor with the size up to 400Mb. I can not open it with a notebook!

>> But I am quite sure what are recorded in the snmpcol.conf. it must be

>> something like this "Thur. Aug 14 15:29:39  : Deferring SNMP 
>> collection of avgBusy5.0 on
>>         10.10.30.200 60 minutes (1.00 hours).  Consecutive deferral 
>> #1. "
>> 
>> How to make snmpcollect get data succefully every time it collects 
>> configured OID values? If it can not do it successfully all the time,

>> in the following .conf, how to make the Deferal interval shorter to 5

>> minture?
>> 
>> Collecting data correctly is very important in this scenario!
>> 
>> The following is a sample snmpcol.conf
>> 
>> ############## beginning ########################
>> MIB .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.11 .* ifInUcastPkts pkts/sec COUNTER S hbyang
>> 
>> W 10.10.10.* 0xffffffff 3600 > 10000.000000 <= 50.000000  s 58720263
>> 
>> MIB .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.17 .* ifOutUcastPkt units/sec COUNTER S hbyang
>> 
>> W 10.10.10.* 0xffffffff 3600 > 10000.000000 <= 50.000000  s 58720263
>> 
>> MIB .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.14 .* ifInErrors errors/sec COUNTER R hbyang
>> 
>> C smartset:Routers 0xffffffff 1800 > 10.000000 <= 90.000000  s 
>> 58720263
>> 
>> MIB .1.3.6.1.2.1.2.2.1.20 .* ifOutErrors errors/sec COUNTER S hbyang
>> 
>> W 10.10.10.* 0xffffffff 3600 > 10.000000 <= 90.000000  s 58720263
>> 
>> MIB .1.3.6.1.2.1.11.1 0 snmpInPkts units/sec COUNTER S hbyang
>> 
>> W 10.10.10.* 0xffffffff 3600 > 10.000000 <= 70.000000  s 58720263
>> 
>> MIB BandwidthUtilHdx .* BandwidthUtilHdx units EXPRESSION R hbyang
>> 
>> C smartset:Routers 0xffffffff 1800 > 20.000000 <= 75.000000  s 
>> 58720263
>> 
>> MIB .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.2.1.58 0 avgBusy5 units INTEGER R hbyang
>> 
>> C smartset:CiscoDevices 0xffffffff 1800 > 90.000000 <= 75.000000  s 
>> 58720263
>> 
>> MIB .1.3.6.1.4.1.9.2.1.46 0 bufferFail units INTEGER R hbyang
>> 
>> C smartset:CiscoDevices 0xffffffff 1800 > 0.000000 <= 0.000000 x s 
>> 58720263
>> 
>> MIB .1.3.6.1.2.1.6.9 0 tcpCurrEstab units GAUGE R hbyang
>> 
>> C smartset:WebServers 0xffffffff 1800 > 0.000000 <= 0.000000 xA s 
>> 58720263
>> 
>> #################### End 
>> ##############################################
>> 
>> Thank you all!
>> 
>> Cordially
>> 
>> Bruce Yang
>> 0086-755-26743243
>> hbyang@sysway.com
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: nv-l-unsubscribe@lists.tivoli.com For 
>> additional commands, e-mail: nv-l-help@lists.tivoli.com
>> 
>> *NOTE*
>> This is not an Offical Tivoli Support forum. If you need immediate 
>> assistance from Tivoli please call the IBM Tivoli Software Group help

>> line at 1-800-TIVOLI8(848-6548)
>> 
>> 
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: nv-l-unsubscribe@lists.tivoli.com For 
>> additional commands, e-mail: nv-l-help@lists.tivoli.com
>> 
>> *NOTE*
>> This is not an Offical Tivoli Support forum. If you need immediate 
>> assistance from Tivoli please call the IBM Tivoli Software Group help

>> line at 1-800-TIVOLI8(848-6548)
>> 
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: nv-l-unsubscribe@lists.tivoli.com
>For additional commands, e-mail: nv-l-help@lists.tivoli.com
>
>*NOTE*
>This is not an Offical Tivoli Support forum. If you need immediate 
>assistance from Tivoli please call the IBM Tivoli Software Group help 
>line at 1-800-TIVOLI8(848-6548)

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
                        

        致
礼!
 
                                 
        Haibo Yang
        hbyang@sysway.com
          2003-09-02




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: nv-l-unsubscribe@lists.tivoli.com
For additional commands, e-mail: nv-l-help@lists.tivoli.com

*NOTE*
This is not an Offical Tivoli Support forum. If you need immediate
assistance from Tivoli please call the IBM Tivoli Software Group help
line at 1-800-TIVOLI8(848-6548)


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: nv-l-unsubscribe@lists.tivoli.com
For additional commands, e-mail: nv-l-help@lists.tivoli.com

*NOTE*
This is not an Offical Tivoli Support forum. If you need immediate
assistance from Tivoli please call the IBM Tivoli Software Group
help line at 1-800-TIVOLI8(848-6548)


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web