To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [nv-l] Netview Polling |
From: | Leslie Clark <lclark@us.ibm.com> |
Date: | Thu, 13 Jan 2005 10:20:27 -0500 |
Delivery-date: | Thu, 13 Jan 2005 15:21:07 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
In-reply-to: | <OF59D77851.8B5C040B-ON80256F88.002DC4CB-80256F88.0034BA21@mmm.com> |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
You cannot stop netmon from discovering all addresses on a router, that's its job. However, in the case where you don't have routing to those addresses, you should just tell netmon to poll them via snmp. It will then do an snmpget of the ifOperStatus of all of the interfaces, through the one address you do have SNMP access to, and they will be nice and green. You can do this either by putting one address for each one in the seedfile with $ in front of it, or, in the /usr/OV/conf/oid_to_type file, you can put add the S flag to the OID for those types of routers. Stop/start netmon, and you are all set. Regarding Francois' advice to add name resolution for the trap sources, I would add that when you do this, you want to make sure that the forward resolution resolves to the address you reach it by. If you were using just the hosts file, it would be like this: 10.10.10.5 MyRouter1 # the address that I can talk to 10.10.10.1 My Router1 # The loopback address of the router, where traps come from So when Netview discovers it by 10.10.10.5, it will name it MyRouter1. When a trap comes in from 10.10.10.1, it will look that address up and assign it to MyRouter1 in the events display. When you use menu functions on Netview against the node MyRouter1, it will lookup the address and use 10.10.10.5. If the .5 address is already in your DNS, and you decide to add the .1 address to the etc\hosts file on the Windows box, you must also add the .5 address to the etc\hosts file because the hosts file will take precidence. Cordially, Leslie A. Clark IBM Global Services - Systems Mgmt & Networking (248) 552-4968 Voicemail, Fax, Pager
Hi, I'm on Windows 2000 with Netview 7.1.4 FP2. I've been doing some traces of what Netview is doing and I've seen quite a lot of activity. I was wondering how I could stop it. I have 'discover all networks' with @limit_discovery in my netmon.seed along with a list of the ranges it should work with. Basically we have various parts of the network outsourced. I have negotiated SNMP read access to all these routers. Netview discovers these routers quite happily but also discovers that they have lots of other interfaces with strange IP addresses. There is no routing in our network to these addresses. Even though I have limited the range of IP addresses that Netview should discover via the NETMON.SEED file, it still insists on PINGing and doing NBNS name lookups on these addresses. Of course these packets flow out of our default route and try to get to the Internet. This not only wastes bandwidth but gets our IDS people after me as they think a box has a virus trying to get to all sorts of strange addresses which have nothing to do with our organisation. Is there an automatic method (forget manually unmanaging things) of stopping netview from refering to anything not specified in the seed file. Regards, Alan. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [nv-l] NV tuning for Data collection, Liu, David |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [nv-l] Loading ibm2100.mib, Javier Morate Guerrero |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] Netview Polling, Francois Le Hir |
Next by Thread: | Re: [nv-l] Netview Polling, Francois Le Hir |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web