Re: [nv-l] How to permanently set nodes to unmanged state

[Paul <pstroud@bellsouth.net>]

Glen,
It sounds like you might have these devices on more than one map.
Run an ovwls and post the output.

Paul


Glen Warn wrote:

> Hi Paul,
>
> I've actually tried putting them in both ways:
>
> !10.10.10.25-35 (as an example) 
> or
> !10.10.10.25
> !10.10.10.26
> !10.10.10.27
> !10.10.10.28
> etc
>
> Neither seem to make Netview ignore them.  I am assuming the
> #Workstations is a comment on the end of line for admin purposes - if
> that is wrong please let me know.
>
> Glen Warn
> PEMCO Corporation Computer Services (PCCS)
> glen.warn@pemcocorp.com
> 206-628-5770
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com]
> On Behalf Of Paul
> Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 9:28 AM
> To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
> Subject: Re: [nv-l] How to permanently set nodes to unmanged state
>
> Glen,
> If its a range of addresses you can add something like this to the
> seedfile:
>
> !10.10.10.25-200 #Workstations
>
> Or something like that. Im not sure how the "limit discovery" puts it
> int the seedfile off the top of my head.
>
> Paul
>
>
> Glen Warn wrote:
>
>  
>
> > Hi Paul,
> >
> > Good point.  I've tried adding them to the netmon.seed "limit
> >    
> discovery"
>  
>
> > but they still keep getting discovered.  Any ideas? 
> >
> > Glen Warn
> > PEMCO Corporation Computer Services (PCCS) glen.warn@pemcocorp.com 
> > 206-628-5770
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com]
> > On Behalf Of Paul
> > Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 4:10 AM
> > To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
> > Subject: Re: [nv-l] How to permanently set nodes to unmanged state
> >
> > Glen,
> > Why discover them in the first place?
> >
> > Paul
> >
> >
> > Glen Warn wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >    
> >
> > > I have several remote access subnets (a few dial, some vpn) where 
> > > remote users are allocated DHCP addresses.  I do not want to manage 
> > > these nodes and set them to unmanaged - but Netview keeps setting them
> > >   
> > >
> > >      
> >
> >    
> >
> > > back to managed (and inevitably changes their state to down) - I 
> > > suspect because it detects the connection as new (different MAC 
> > > address perhaps) even though the IPs are the same.  Is there way to 
> > > permanently set a block of addresses to unmanaged?
> > > Netview 7.1.4
> > >
> > > Thanks for your time,
> > > Glen Warn
> > > PEMCO Corporation Computer Services (PCCS) glen.warn@pemcocorp.com 
> > > <mailto:glen.warn@pemcocorp.com> 206-628-5770
> > >   
> > >
> > >      
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >    
>
>
>
>
>