nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [nv-l] How to permanently set nodes to unmanged state

To: <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com>
Subject: RE: [nv-l] How to permanently set nodes to unmanged state
From: "Glen Warn" <Glen.Warn@pemcocorp.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 09:59:15 -0700
Delivery-date: Thu, 12 May 2005 17:59:38 +0100
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
Reply-to: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Thread-index: AcVXD6uoiVo6CUIUTiu4q5MEM2haPgAA++bg
Thread-topic: [nv-l] How to permanently set nodes to unmanged state
Hi Paul,

I've actually tried putting them in both ways:

!10.10.10.25-35 (as an example) 
or
!10.10.10.25
!10.10.10.26
!10.10.10.27
!10.10.10.28
etc

Neither seem to make Netview ignore them.  I am assuming the
#Workstations is a comment on the end of line for admin purposes - if
that is wrong please let me know.

Glen Warn
PEMCO Corporation Computer Services (PCCS)
glen.warn@pemcocorp.com
206-628-5770

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com]
On Behalf Of Paul
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 9:28 AM
To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [nv-l] How to permanently set nodes to unmanged state

Glen,
If its a range of addresses you can add something like this to the
seedfile:

!10.10.10.25-200 #Workstations

Or something like that. Im not sure how the "limit discovery" puts it
int the seedfile off the top of my head.

Paul


Glen Warn wrote:

>Hi Paul,
>
>Good point.  I've tried adding them to the netmon.seed "limit
discovery"
>but they still keep getting discovered.  Any ideas? 
>
>
>Glen Warn
>PEMCO Corporation Computer Services (PCCS) glen.warn@pemcocorp.com 
>206-628-5770
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com]
>On Behalf Of Paul
>Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 4:10 AM
>To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
>Subject: Re: [nv-l] How to permanently set nodes to unmanged state
>
>Glen,
>Why discover them in the first place?
>
>Paul
>
>
>Glen Warn wrote:
>
>  
>
>>I have several remote access subnets (a few dial, some vpn) where 
>>remote users are allocated DHCP addresses.  I do not want to manage 
>>these nodes and set them to unmanaged - but Netview keeps setting them
>>    
>>
>
>  
>
>>back to managed (and inevitably changes their state to down) - I 
>>suspect because it detects the connection as new (different MAC 
>>address perhaps) even though the IPs are the same.  Is there way to 
>>permanently set a block of addresses to unmanaged?
>> 
>>Netview 7.1.4
>> 
>>Thanks for your time,
>>Glen Warn
>>PEMCO Corporation Computer Services (PCCS) glen.warn@pemcocorp.com 
>><mailto:glen.warn@pemcocorp.com> 206-628-5770
>> 
>>    
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  
>





<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web