nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [nv-l] How to permanently set nodes to unmanged state

To: <nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com>
Subject: RE: [nv-l] How to permanently set nodes to unmanged state
From: "Glen Warn" <Glen.Warn@pemcocorp.com>
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 09:17:23 -0700
Delivery-date: Thu, 12 May 2005 17:17:25 +0100
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
Reply-to: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Thread-index: AcVP0PYId5ImyI0XSO+iXqbvSZPqKQHPQXzQ
Thread-topic: [nv-l] How to permanently set nodes to unmanged state
Hi Paul,

Good point.  I've tried adding them to the netmon.seed "limit discovery"
but they still keep getting discovered.  Any ideas? 


Glen Warn
PEMCO Corporation Computer Services (PCCS)
glen.warn@pemcocorp.com
206-628-5770

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com]
On Behalf Of Paul
Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 4:10 AM
To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [nv-l] How to permanently set nodes to unmanged state

Glen,
Why discover them in the first place?

Paul


Glen Warn wrote:

> I have several remote access subnets (a few dial, some vpn) where 
> remote users are allocated DHCP addresses.  I do not want to manage 
> these nodes and set them to unmanaged - but Netview keeps setting them

> back to managed (and inevitably changes their state to down) - I 
> suspect because it detects the connection as new (different MAC 
> address perhaps) even though the IPs are the same.  Is there way to 
> permanently set a block of addresses to unmanaged?
>  
> Netview 7.1.4
>  
> Thanks for your time,
> Glen Warn
> PEMCO Corporation Computer Services (PCCS) glen.warn@pemcocorp.com 
> <mailto:glen.warn@pemcocorp.com> 206-628-5770
>  






<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web