nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [nv-l] Where is the MIB for Netview internal traps ???

To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [nv-l] Where is the MIB for Netview internal traps ???
From: Jane Curry <jane.curry@skills-1st.co.uk>
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 20:23:47 +0000
Delivery-date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 20:24:44 +0000
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
In-reply-to: <20060112175008.GD6692@localhost.localdomain>
References: <OFD7BBBDD0.8D0490CF-ON852570F4.005E9CFD-852570F4.005EA97E@us.ibm.com> <OF85C5FFD6.12F4E593-ON852570F4.005F1E54-852570F4.005F65C1@us.ibm.com> <20060112175008.GD6692@localhost.localdomain>
Reply-to: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird 0.5 (X11/20040208)
You do need to be a bit careful using the event command to generate some of the NetView internal traps. For instance, the Interface Down trap was changed a few minor releases back to send more varbinds. Real Interface Down events are generated correctly but test ones generated with the event command are to the original format. On NetView for Unix, you generally get away with this, but if you have ever wondered why, on NetView for Windows, some test events generated with "event" don't appear - this is why.

Doesn't really address Michael's point but it may be tangentially useful.

Cheers,
Jane

Michael D Schleif wrote:

James, et al. =>

* James Shanks <jshanks@us.ibm.com> [2006:01:12:12:21:52-0500] scribed:
Hit "send" too quickly.  NetView Internal traps are documented, however, in
Appendix D of the NetView for Windows User's Guide, and in Appendix A of
the NetView for UNIX Administrator's Guide.  The latest documentation can
be obtained from the web,
http://publib.boulder.ibm.com/infocenter/tivihelp/v3r1/index.jsp?toc=/com.ibm.itnetview.doc/toc.xml

Also, in addition to my questions in other response, and directly in
response to this suggestion, has ALL of the information been verified in
the Administrator's Guide, Appendix A?

For example, enterprise specific 50790403 & 50790404 use 'netName'; but,
50790416 & 50790417 use 'netname' -- please, NOTICE the exact case used
in each.  When the case varies in this document, is that 100% accurate?

Of course, if I had the MIB, then I would know _exactly_ what NV is
using ;<

What do you think?

James Shanks
Level 3 Support  for Tivoli NetView for UNIX and Windows
Tivoli Software / IBM Software Group
<snip />


--
Tivoli Certified Consultant & Instructor
Skills 1st Limited, 2 Cedar Chase, Taplow, Bucks, SL6 0EU, UK
Tel: +44 (0)1628 782565
Copyright (c) 2006 Jane Curry <jane.curry@skills-1st.co.uk>.  All rights 
reserved.


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web