| To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | RE: [nv-l] Polling Question |
| From: | Stephen Hochstetler <shochste@us.ibm.com> |
| Date: | Tue, 6 Jun 2006 15:29:39 -0500 |
| Delivery-date: | Tue, 06 Jun 2006 21:30:25 +0100 |
| Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
| In-reply-to: | <5346DEF69D33354893292D49F01A801D1236FE8F@svlexc05.hq.netapp.com> |
| Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
| Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
|
with 900 nodes in a local hosts file it is likely you are experiencing high CPU? You have a dual CPU box, do you have tools that will show how the CPU usage is on each? If you are total at 50%, could that mean that netmon is pegged one of the CPUs? In the past I did this on a NetView server on a 4-way. When I switched from a large hosts file to a caching DNS configuration my netmon CPU usage went from 100% (of a single CPU) down to 6%. |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | RE: [nv-l] Polling Question, Skokan, Paul |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | RE: [nv-l] Polling Question, Skokan, Paul |
| Previous by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] Polling Question, Skokan, Paul |
| Next by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] Polling Question, Skokan, Paul |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web