RE: Managing Private addresses with Netview

["Painter, Bill" <BPainter@GILATFLORIDA.com>]

This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.

Thanks Martin for the information! 

I still would like to know if anyone can see a problem with using the mlm
approach.  If I used public addresses on these devices and ping them I would
have a root map that consisted only of MLM's  they would in turn "see" the
privately addressed devices and on the network map show up as managed by the
mlm's.

Anyone have a comment on this?

Thanks,
Bill

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Walder [mailto:mw@itmasters.com]
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 4:13 AM
To: IBM NetView Discussion
Subject: Re: [NV-L] Managing Private addresses with Netview


Bill

Check out the CNAT product at this address:-

 http://www.tivoli.com/products/documents/datasheets/cnat_ds.pdf

--
Martin Walder
Tivoli Certified Enterprise Consultant

IT Masters (UK) Ltd
Unit 5, CNC House,
Grand Union Office Park,
Packet Boat Lane,
Uxbridge UB8 2GH

Tel:     +44 (0) 1895 909 500
Mobile:  +44 (0) 771 315 8548
Fax:     +44 (0) 1895 909 501
Internet http://www.itmasters.com

"Painter, Bill" wrote:

>
>
> Can Netview  manage a number of duplicate private address by not
> pinging directly but using only Remote pingers or MLM type devices?
>
> If anyone knows of documentation that they could direct me to I would
> appreciate it!
>
> Thanks!
>
> Bill Painter
> Sr. Network Administrator
> Gilat-To-Home Latin America, Inc.
> 1560 Sawgrass Corporate Parkway
> Suite # 200
> Sunrise, Fl. 33323
> Phone: 954-331-1024
> Fax: 954-858-1777
> E-Mail: bpainter@gilatflorida.com
>

_________________________________________________________________________
NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l

Thanks Martin for the information!

I still would like to know if anyone can see a problem with using the mlm approach.  If I used public addresses on these devices and ping them I would have a root map that consisted only of MLM's  they would in turn "see" the privately addressed devices and on the network map show up as managed by the mlm's.

Anyone have a comment on this?

Thanks,
Bill

-----Original Message-----
From: Martin Walder [mailto:mw@itmasters.com]
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 4:13 AM
To: IBM NetView Discussion
Subject: Re: [NV-L] Managing Private addresses with Netview

Bill

Check out the CNAT product at this address:-

 http://www.tivoli.com/products/documents/datasheets/cnat_ds.pdf

--
Martin Walder
Tivoli Certified Enterprise Consultant

IT Masters (UK) Ltd
Unit 5, CNC House,
Grand Union Office Park,
Packet Boat Lane,
Uxbridge UB8 2GH

Tel:     +44 (0) 1895 909 500
Mobile:  +44 (0) 771 315 8548
Fax:     +44 (0) 1895 909 501
Internet http://www.itmasters.com

"Painter, Bill" wrote:

>
>
> Can Netview  manage a number of duplicate private address by not
> pinging directly but using only Remote pingers or MLM type devices?
>
> If anyone knows of documentation that they could direct me to I would
> appreciate it!
>
> Thanks!
>
> Bill Painter
> Sr. Network Administrator
> Gilat-To-Home Latin America, Inc.
> 1560 Sawgrass Corporate Parkway
> Suite # 200
> Sunrise, Fl. 33323
> Phone: 954-331-1024
> Fax: 954-858-1777
> E-Mail: bpainter@gilatflorida.com
>

_________________________________________________________________________
NV-L List information and Archives: http://www.tkg.com/nv-l