nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [nv-l] False alarm

To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: RE: [nv-l] False alarm
From: Oliver Bruchhaeuser <oliver.bruchhaeuser@de.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:47:36 +0200
Delivery-date: Fri, 23 Apr 2004 14:02:05 +0100
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
In-reply-to: <!~!UENERkVCMDkAAQACAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAABgAAAAAAAAAC8F6moPp0xGEXQAgGI7hlcKAAAAQAAAAxyJfiJbam0C3643YKac+3AEAAAAA@ieee.org>
Reply-to: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com

if the interface is really up (can be pinged) but is reported down per SNMP
this is either a bug in the routers snmp agent or a config problem on the router.
Talk to your network guys.
This is not a NetView problem.

Oliver



"Ioannis Yerou" <ioannisi@ieee.org>
Sent by: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com

23.04.2004 13:40
Please respond to
nv-l

To
<nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com>
cc
Subject
RE: [nv-l] False alarm





Oliver,
 
I ran the snmpwalk for the ifIndex and the integer returned was (4). Then I ran the snmpwalk for the status of the interface (4) and shows down. What do I do next?
 
Regards,
Ioannis
 
-----Original Message-----
From:
owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com] On Behalf Of Oliver Bruchhaeuser
Sent:
Friday, April 23, 2004 11:46 AM
To:
nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject:
RE: [nv-l] False alarm

 

Ioannis
,

first get the ifIndex of the IP Address in question from the ipAddrTable:

snmpwalk <router> ip.ipAddrTable.ipAddrEntry.ipAdEntIfIndex

Then look for the ifOperStatus for the concerning ifIndex:

snmpwalk <router> interfaces.ifTable.ifEntry.ifOperStatus


I assume it's down (config problem?) or the ifIndex is missing completely (Firmware bug).


Oliver

"Ioannis Yerou" <ioannisi@ieee.org>
Sent by: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com

22.04.2004 11:41


Please respond to
nv-l


To
<nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com>
cc
 
Subject
RE: [nv-l] False alarm

 


   





Don and Blane,

 
Yes, the SNMP status polling is used. What resources should I look for? The lines (interfaces) are Frame Relay to the branch (ATM in the backbone).

 
Regards,

Ioannis

 
-----Original Message-----
From:
owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com] On Behalf Of Davis, Donald
Sent:
Wednesday, April 21, 2004 3:37 PM
To:
'nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com'
Subject:
RE: [nv-l] False alarm

 

Are you using SNMP status polling for these routers ?

I have seen this when resources are low on the NetView server, which may cause SNMP status polling to time out.

Don Davis

-----Original Message-----
From:
Ioannis Yerou [mailto:ioannisi@ieee.org]
Sent:
Wednesday, April 21, 2004 6:40 AM
To:
nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject:
[nv-l] False alarm

Hello list,

 

I am facing the following problem: We have about 200 branches (ARN Nortel routers) and for some branches about 10, the routers are shown as yellow. When I check the interfaces I see that the WAN interface is red. When I test the interface (ping) the interface responds and becomes green. After some seconds it goes back to read state. Any ideas why this is happening will be greatly appreciated.

 

Netview 7.1.1

AIX 4.3

ARN Nortel Routers

 

Best regards,

Ioannis Yerou

Senior Systems Programmer/Communications

ITD, Bank of Cyprus

 
 

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This electronic mail and any files transmitted with it are confidential and are intended solely for the use of individual or entity to whom they are addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the electronic mail to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this electronic mail in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing, or copying of this electronic mail is strictly prohibited. If you have received this electronic mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by return mail.
==============================================================================

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web