nv-l
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

RE: [nv-l] ATM problem

from [Stephen Hochstetler] [Permanent Link][Original]
To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: RE: [nv-l] ATM problem
From: Stephen Hochstetler <shochste@us.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 15:12:14 -0600
Delivery-date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:18:07 +0000
Envelope-to: nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk
In-reply-to: <80650330980231449B38090CAC84317303197925@exch1.dot.state.az.us>
Reply-to: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Sender: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com

Let me be more specific... :-)

For that ATM device... does NetView 7.x and NetView 6.x have the exact same interfaces discovered? If you do an ovobjprint <hostname> do you see the same number of interfaces from both NetViews?

The CPU comment was for the network device, not the NetView servers. When you do a demandpoll (from both NetViews) you see them both doing ICMP polls?

Stephen Hochstetler shochste@us.ibm.com
International Technical Support Organization at IBM
Office - 512-838-6198 (t/l 678) FAX - 512-838-6931
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com

[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  RE: [nv-l] ATM problem, Alan E. Hennis
Next by Date:  RE: [nv-l] ATM problem, DSullinger
Previous by Thread:  RE: [nv-l] ATM problem, DSullinger
Next by Thread:  RE: [nv-l] ATM problem, DSullinger
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd

See also: The NetView Web