To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: [nv-l] ATM problem |
From: | DSullinger@dot.state.az.us |
Date: | Mon, 12 Jan 2004 13:54:01 -0700 |
Delivery-date: | Mon, 12 Jan 2004 21:38:51 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
> 6.0 and v7 NetView have the same number of interfaces
discovered
v7x has 6,578 while v6x has 6,532
> SNMP status poll of the device or using ICMP
I think ICMP
> Does it really have an IP address
Yes
> Could it be that this box is low on CPU power
I'm watching the CPU usage on both machines using
top and they run consistently at over 90% idle. These are pretty nice
servers, the 6x box is a Sun Enterprise E3500 with 2GB of memory
w/2x400MHz CPUs and the other is a Sun Sunblade 1000 w/4GB of memory
and 2x900MHz CPUs.
From: Stephen Hochstetler [mailto:shochste@us.ibm.com] Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 1:35 PM To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com Subject: RE: [nv-l] ATM problem For this device, does your 6.0 and v7 NetView have the same number of
interfaces discovered? I just wonder if 6.x did not discover the interface and
thus will never say it is down. |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | RE: [nv-l] ATM problem, Stephen Hochstetler |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [nv-l] ATM problem, DSullinger |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] ATM problem, Alan E. Hennis |
Next by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] ATM problem, Stephen Hochstetler |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web