RE: [nv-l] ATM problem

["Erdey, Raymond M" <Raymond.M.Erdey@erac.com>]

Make the "routeEntries" the same on both servers...  The lower number may be the better one to use... For example, Cisco devices have an issue if you use a large "routeEntries" value:  <http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/477/SNMP/ipsnmphighcpu.shtml>

Raymond Erdey
Enterprise Rent-A-Car
System Administrator
Network Management System Administration
Email: raymond.m.erdey@erac.com
Web: http://www.geocities.com/rerdey/

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com]On Behalf Of DSullinger@dot.state.az.us
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 12:02 PM
To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: RE: [nv-l] ATM problem

Community name is the same but they are both reporting different number of routeEntries and there's a big difference and I've checked this several times.  The v6 machine reports 800 entries and the v7 machine reports 2000 entries.

 

---

From: Erdey, Raymond M [mailto:Raymond.M.Erdey@erac.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 10:43 AM
To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: RE: [nv-l] ATM problem

Make sure that the "community" string, as reported by the following command, is the same on both servers:

    xnmsnmpconf -res DeviceName

Where "DeviceName" is the "Selection Name" of the Network device in question.

Raymond Erdey
Enterprise Rent-A-Car
System Administrator
Network Management System Administration
Email: raymond.m.erdey@erac.com
Web: http://www.geocities.com/rerdey/

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com [mailto:owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com]On Behalf Of DSullinger@dot.state.az.us
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 3:50 PM
To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: RE: [nv-l] ATM problem

> does NetView 7.x and NetView 6.x have the exact same interfaces discovered

 

Yes

 

> CPU comment was for the network device, not the NetView servers

 

Sorry I miss-understood.  I'm not sure how this would make a difference... they both get the same information from the network device and the v6 Netview always shows it up, while the v7 Netview shows it red.  If the CPU was pegging out at 100% it seams that both server databases would be effected.

 

> you see them both doing ICMP polls?

 

No, they both do SNMP.

 

Thanks

 

---

From: Stephen Hochstetler [mailto:shochste@us.ibm.com]
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 2:12 PM
To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com
Subject: RE: [nv-l] ATM problem

Let me be more specific... :-)

For that ATM device... does NetView 7.x and NetView 6.x have the exact same interfaces discovered? If you do an ovobjprint <hostname> do you see the same number of interfaces from both NetViews?

The CPU comment was for the network device, not the NetView servers. When you do a demandpoll (from both NetViews) you see them both doing ICMP polls?

Stephen Hochstetler shochste@us.ibm.com
International Technical Support Organization at IBM
Office - 512-838-6198 (t/l 678) FAX - 512-838-6931
http://www.redbooks.ibm.com