To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: [nv-l] ATM problem |
From: | DSullinger@dot.state.az.us |
Date: | Wed, 14 Jan 2004 11:01:43 -0700 |
Delivery-date: | Wed, 14 Jan 2004 18:08:25 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Community name is the same but they are both reporting
different number of routeEntries and there's a big difference and I've checked
this several times. The v6 machine reports 800 entries and the v7 machine
reports 2000 entries.
From: Erdey, Raymond M [mailto:Raymond.M.Erdey@erac.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 10:43 AM To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com Subject: RE: [nv-l] ATM problem Make
sure that the "community" string, as reported by the following command, is the
same on both servers:
xnmsnmpconf -res DeviceName
Where
"DeviceName" is the "Selection Name" of the Network device in
question.
Raymond Erdey
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [nv-l] FixPack 2, Qureshi, Fawad |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [nv-l] FixPack 2, Paul |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] ATM problem, Erdey, Raymond M |
Next by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] ATM problem, DSullinger |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web