To: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
---|---|
Subject: | RE: [nv-l] ATM problem |
From: | DSullinger@dot.state.az.us |
Date: | Wed, 14 Jan 2004 12:34:11 -0700 |
Delivery-date: | Wed, 14 Jan 2004 19:42:23 +0000 |
Envelope-to: | nv-l-archive@lists.skills-1st.co.uk |
Reply-to: | nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
Sender: | owner-nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com |
This get's more interesting all the time. The DNS
entry for the hub router that the ATM circuit is connected to is 10.0.200.1, but
the version 6x Netview is showing 10.0.195.1, which is one of the other
interfaces on the router. The v7 Netview is showing it as it's proper DNS
name and correct IP address.
Think we should just delete that router from all the
submaps and let it rediscover?
From: Erdey, Raymond M [mailto:Raymond.M.Erdey@erac.com] Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 10:43 AM To: nv-l@lists.us.ibm.com Subject: RE: [nv-l] ATM problem Make
sure that the "community" string, as reported by the following command, is the
same on both servers:
xnmsnmpconf -res DeviceName
Where
"DeviceName" is the "Selection Name" of the Network device in
question.
Raymond Erdey
|
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [nv-l] James Markham/Raleigh/IBM is out of the office on business. I will have limited access to email., James Markham |
---|---|
Next by Date: | RE: [nv-l] ATM problem, Erdey, Raymond M |
Previous by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] ATM problem, DSullinger |
Next by Thread: | RE: [nv-l] ATM problem, Erdey, Raymond M |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |
Archive operated by Skills 1st Ltd
See also: The NetView Web